Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 03:28

Thank you.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Are there any types of headphones or earbuds that are specifically designed for wearing overnight?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
One of the Best Xbox Series X Games Is $56 Off Right Now - ComicBook.com
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
We've Finally Seen The Skyscraper Tsunami That Shook Earth For 9 Days - ScienceAlert
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
$200 for a Refurbished MacBook Air Is a Tough Deal to Beat - PCMag
Just in the last 5 years:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Knicks' Decision to Fire Tom Thibodeau Was Brewing For 'Months' - Sports Illustrated